CA10: Defendant consented when told drug dog was coming

Defendant consented to a search when he was told, when there was reasonable suspicion, that a drug dog would be coming and would arrive in 15-20 minutes. United States v. Thao, 291 Fed. Appx. 129 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Defendant lacked standing to contest the search of a camper on the road that he stored drugs in. Even if he did, the police activity was based on a CI corroborated by surveillance, and it was an independent source. United States v. Cabaniss, 286 Fed. Appx. 196 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Defendant’s Miranda waiver was voluntary on the totality, including the fact that he was familiar with criminal law. United States v. Doody, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60382 (D. Me. August 6, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.