CA3: Bloody man and blood trail into motel room were exigent circumstances for entry

Response to a 911 call at a motel led police to observe the bleeding defendant and a blood trail into a room. When the police tried to go into the room with defendant, he fled. The officers continued into the room, and the record supports that the contraband was found in plain view in the room and its evidentiary value was immediately apparent. United States v. McNeill, 285 Fed. Appx. 975 (3d Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Defense counsel is not ineffective for not giving defendant a copy of the suppression hearing transcript. State v. Shelton, 2008 Ohio 4016, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 3396 (2d Dist. August 8, 2008).*

Defendant probationer’s live-in girlfriend’s consent to a search of their house to police obviated the need for probation officers to have reasonable suspicion for a probation search. State v. Boysel, 2008 Ohio 4037, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 3395 (4th Dist. August 1, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.