Patdown was justified by defendant shoving hands in pants, and plain feel revealed drugs

Defendant’s patdown revealed evidence by plain feel. He happened upon a search in progress, and, when a flashlight was shined in his face, he appeared confused and shoved his hands into his pants pockets. That led to a patdown. State v. Mullins, 2008 Ohio 3516, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2972 (12th Dist. July 14, 2008).*

Defendant actually waived his argument on appeal of apparent authority to consent by arguing voluntariness of consent in the district court. United States v. Peña-Baez, 285 Fed. Appx. 553 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

In appellate review of a motion to suppress, the testimony at trial can also be considered. State v. Robertson, 988 So. 2d 294 (La. App. 3d Cir. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.