Going to bathroom conditioned on consent to search was invalid

During a traffic stop, the defendant passenger asked to go to the bathroom. The officer conditioned going to the bathroom on consenting to a search. The consent was invalid. State v. Haynes, 221 Ore. App. 204, 190 P.3d 386 (2008).

Smell of burnt marijuana coming from a car during a traffic stop did not justify a search of every person in the car, applying the Washington Constitution. State v. Grande, 164 Wn. 2d 135, 187 P.3d 248 (2008):

Our cases have strongly and rightfully protected our constitution’s protection of individual privacy. The protections of article I, section 7 do not fade away or disappear within the confines of an automobile. Parker, 139 Wn.2d at 505. We have always been careful to balance an individual’s privacy concerns with the safety concerns and law enforcement duties of police officers. Within this balance, we have carefully safeguarded constitutional privacy rights by adherence to the requirement of an individualized determination before those rights can be infringed.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.