Postal employees consent to searches at work

Postal employees consent to a search of their belongings when they come to work. Postal regulations and signs provide for it, and they know it well. United States v. Sihler, 562 F.2d 349 (5th Cir. 1977). United States v. Esser, 284 Fed. Appx. 757 (11th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).

The fact the street was under construction and lanes were hard to follow did not make the officer’s testimony unbelievable about probable cause for defendant’s stop for improper lane usage. United States v. McCane, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52591 (W.D. Okla. July 10, 2008)* (Comment: Of course. The ends can justify the means.)

Plaintiff’s claim that defendants detained her at the police station for questioning without probable cause was sufficient to stay in court. Saenz v. Lucas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52400 (S.D. N.Y. June 9, 2008)*:

Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a plausible claim that her detention and interrogation at the police station with DiGiacomo and Lucas and her detention and interrogation with Lucas at Eggenhauser’s office were without probable cause and under circumstances in which the officers’ conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that she was not free to terminate the encounter. Plaintiff alleges that she was detained and interrogated without probable cause after she protested that she wanted to leave and did not want to be involved, and that the officers interrogated and threatened her and made false statements to coerce her to retaliate against Tancredi. Therefore plaintiff’s claims against DiGiacomo and Lucas survive this motion to dismiss.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.