Actual seizure doesn’t justify PC after the fact, but it informs credibility

“Although the evidence or contraband seized during a search cannot justify, ex post facto, the legality of the search, see State v. Sierra, 754 P.2d 972, 977 (Utah App. 1988), it does inform the question of credibility. The items found incident to the search support Officer Bairett’s testimony that he smelled the odor of raw marijuana emanating from the vehicle. Based on Officer Bairett’s testimony and the corroborating evidence, the Court finds that Officer Bairett had probable cause to search Defendants’ vehicle.” [The problem is that this is subject to post hoc rationalization.] United States v. Ellis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51529 (D. Utah July 3, 2008).*

Seatbelt violation justified a stop that revealed an extended clip extending from the butt of a gun in plain view. Defendant’s conduct was also furtive where the gun was seen. United States v. Lewis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51291 (D. V.I. July 2, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.