Abandonment on seeing the police was not caused by a stop that had not yet occurred

Defendant’s abandoning a bag when he saw the police was a voluntary abandonment not caused by the police. The stop had not yet occurred, so it couldn’t cause it. United States v. Tuua, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48054 (D. Haw. June 19, 2008):

It is undisputed that Tuua tossed his black bag into the stream and maintained no control over the bag. The court concludes that Tuua abandoned the bag and therefore lacks standing to challenge its search. In United States v. Mendia, 731 F.2d 1412 (9th Cir. 1984), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s conclusion that the defendant had “abandoned his reasonable expectations of privacy in the heroin by turning it over to [another individual] and making no effort to follow [that individual] after [he] drove away with the heroin in his trunk.” Id. at 1414. The Ninth Circuit noted that the defendant had relinquished control of the heroin and thus “abandoned any reasonable expectation of privacy.” Id. See also United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F.2d 1432, 1437 (9th Cir. 1986) (concluding that “placing garbage for collection constitutes abandonment of the property”).

Trial court’s aborting a suppression hearing based on an erroneous interpretation of a statute on impeding traffic required that the suppression hearing be conducted again. State v. Hannah, 259 S.W.3d 716 (Tenn. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.