Dissipation of alcohol is exigent circumstance for blood draw in vehicular homicide case

“The rapid, natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood creates a single-factor exigent circumstance that will justify the police taking a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw from a defendant, provided that the police have probable cause to believe that defendant committed criminal vehicular homicide or operation.” State v. Shriner, 751 N.W.2d 538 (Minn. 2008).*

Officer’s viewing of defendant swerving within his own lane and driving erratically was sufficient to support his stop. State v. Loy, 2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 425 (May 30, 2008).*

Officer had probable cause to search both driver and passenger when the car was stopped and they both smelled of burnt marijuana. State v. Fewell, 286 Kan. 370, 184 P.3d 903 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.