Entry into bedroom by officer in house by consent was justified under SI doctrine

Officer was in driver’s house by consent. When the defendant was being arrested, the officer followed him into the bedroom when the defendant was getting dressed, and that was valid for officer safety under Chrisman. Hoover v. Director, Dept. of Transportation, 2008 ND 87, 748 N.W.2d 730 (2008).*

Turn signal violation is strict liability, and the fact that the officer may have mixed motives for the stop is irrelevant. State v. Greever, 286 Kan. 124, 183
P.3d 788 (2008), revg State v. Greever, 150 P.3d 918 (Kan. App. February 2, 2007) posted here.*

Fact that a forfeiture seizure was allegedly illegal was not established to show that a default judgment should be set aside. State v. $33,000.00 United States Currency, 2008 ND 96, 748 N.W.2d 420 (N.D. 2008).*

Defendant was riding with a probationer who had been stopped. He was directed out of the car, and he was handcuffed “for officer safety.” While handcuffed he admitted having used marijuana which was an offense. The arrest was valid and supported by the evidence. State v. Gay, 2008 ND 84, 48 N.W.2d 408 (N.D. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.