Defendant’s knowledge police were at door dispensed with need to announce

Police knock at the door without announcement resulted in the door being opened, and, when the police were seen, the occupant tried to close the door. This was an exigent circumstance (futility) permitting dispensing with announcement of purpose for the entry since the occupant obviously knew. State v. Vargas, 2008 NMSC 19, 143 N.M. 692, 181 P.3d 684 (2008).

Police officers turning on their blue lights when approaching two cars parked in a city park did not constitute a seizure of the appellant who did not even see them. Thus, to be seized, the defendant had to know it. The officer decided to stop to investigate what 6-7 people standing between two cars were doing in a park area known for drug use. G.M. v. State, 981 So. 2d 529 (Fla. App. 3 DCA 2008).*

Defendant’s probation search was with reasonable suspicion and was valid. The police developed the reasonable suspicion and called the probation officer for the search. Benya v. State, 985 So. 2d 578 (Fla. App. 4 DCA 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.