Applying additional force after plaintiff stopped resisting, breaking plaintiff’s ankle, resulted in denial of qualified immunity defense

A Native American ran a smoke shop in Rhode Island, and the police came in. One thing led to another, and plaintiff was arrested for disorderly conduct, and he was taken down to the floor in such a way that his ankle was broken. (The initial search was before the court in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Rhode Island, 449 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2006)(en banc).) After a jury trial, he was awarded $301,100 for excessive force, but the district court set aside the verdict on qualified immunity grounds. The First Circuit reversed on qualified immunity and ordered reinstatement of the jury verdict. Taking the testimony in a light that supports the jury verdict, Officer Jones applied increased force to plaintiff even after he stopped resisting, and that would be excessive force. Jennings v. Jones, 499 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007).*

Defendant’s challenge to the admission of her statements was waived by not filing a motion to suppress in the district court. United States v. Colino, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19595 (9th Cir. August 14, 2007)* (unpublished).

Plaintiffs’ arrest was with probable cause to believe that they committed “some crime,” so summary judgment for the officers was appropriate. Phillips v. Stevens, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60215 (S.D. Ohio August 16, 2007).*

Summary judgment for defendant officer granted on excessive force claim. Handcuffing was alleged to be too tight and uncomfortable during drive to book-in, and the officer had to use some “force” to put the plaintiff in the police car, but none of it was excessive. Judson v. Mount Desert Police, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60204 (D. Me. August 10, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.