Parole search of parolee’s house could occur even though parolee was in jail

The defendant was picked up on a PV warrant and jailed. The parole officers went to his house to conduct a parole search and found a weapon. Defendant ramained on parole until revoked. Alternatively, his mother had authority to consent to the search. State v. Allen, 2007 Ohio 3930, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 3532 (5th Dist. August 2, 2007):

[*P28] Because appellant’s PRC had yet to be revoked, appellant remained on PRC at the time of the search. Contrary to appellant’s argument, appellant’s arrest for a violation of his PRC did not automatically terminate his PRC status. Thus, the officers and appellant’s parole officer were justified in conducting a warrantless search of his home pursuant to the “conditions of supervision” form signed by appellant. As is stated above, condition nine of the form authorized a warrantless search of appellant’s home.

Second hand information received by school official from another that could not be supported in fact was insufficient for reasonable suspicion to base a school search. In re J.N.Y., 2007 PA Super 227, 931 A.2d 685 (2007).

Anonymous tip was sufficient. “Law enforcement officers were able to verify the tip’s information about who lived in the home, the appearance of the home, and one of the vehicles parked at the home. The anonymous caller provided specific and detailed information about the criminal history and record of Andrews, including accurately describing an arrest in the mid 1990’s that resulted in drug and firearms charges and ultimately a twenty-year prison sentence. Hence the anonymous tip provided substantial and verifiable “inside information” regarding Andrews, which suggests that the caller had access to reliable information about him.” Andrews v. State, 2007 OK CR 30, 166 P.3d 495 (2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.