Officer successfully manipulates time of stop for drug dog to arrive

The title of this post is argumentative, and you will see why:

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he was nervous. The officer asked for consent, and defendant refused. A drug dog was called which arrived 20 minutes later. This was within the period required to fill out the paperwork on the traffic ticket, so the continuation of the stop was reasonable. State v. Hisel, 2007 Ohio 3808, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 3476 (2d Dist. July 27, 2007). Comment: So, all the officer has to do is drag out completing the paperwork until the dog arrives and everything is OK? This is gross manipulation of the situation by the officer just to make time for the drug dog to arrive and provide cover for extending the stop. And, the appellate court bought into it. Traffic tickets take 2-3 minutes, tops.

Deference to the trial court by the appellate court was lacking. While there was a videotape with audio of the stop, the camera was in a fixed position and could not record everything and the audio was incomplete. The trial court held that the troopers’ encounter with defendants quickly escalated from community caretaking–responding to a disabled vehicle to provide assistance–to an investigative detention. The judge’s findings were close calls. Based on its review of the record, the Supreme Court cannot conclude, however, that those findings were so clearly mistaken that an appellate court should substitute its own judgment for that of the initial factfinder. State v. Elders, 192 N.J. 224, 927 A.2d 1250 (2007), rev’g 386 N.J. Super. 208, 899 A.2d 1037 (2006).

Defendant pulled into the parking lot of the patrol post of the state police at 3 a.m., and two occupants went inside. An officer was curious, so he walked over to the car and it was apparent that the driver was under the influence. This was not a “stop.” State v. Phipps, 2007 Ohio 3842, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 3495 (11th Dist. July 27, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.