MI reverses Jardines-like case

This case was held in abeyance pending Jardines because of its similarity: a dog sniff of a residence. It is reversed rather than rebriefed. People v. Holt, 494 Mich. 863, 831 N.W.2d 241 (2013):

[I]n lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REINSTATE the November 23, 2010 order of the Wayne Circuit Court. In Florida v Jardines, under circumstances very similar to those in this case, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the employment of a drug-sniffing dog within the curtilage of the defendant’s home without a search warrant was a violation of the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. In light of the prosecutor’s concession that absent the canine sniff the warrant was not supported by probable cause, and given the reasoning provided by the United States Supreme Court, the trial court in this case properly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized in the search of his home.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.