Passenger’s “flight” was a factor in reasonable suspicion as to driver

Passenger’s walking away from a vehicle that pulled into a convenience store and officer put on blue lights was a factor in reasonable suspicion as to the driver. United States v. Johnson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79270 (S.D. Ohio October 12, 2007):

Officer Sykes approached the vehicle because the front seat passenger quickly exited the vehicle and rapidly walked to the convenience store immediately after the officers arrived in a marked cruiser. This Court finds that the actions of the passenger provided reasonable suspicion for Officer Sykes to further investigate. In Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000), the United States Supreme Court found under similar circumstances that an officer is justified in maintaining a reasonable suspicion based on such behavior. It was not merely Defendant’s presence in a high crime area, but, also the passenger’s unprovoked and rapid exit from the area that aroused the officers’ suspicion in this case. As observed in Wardlow, “[o]ur cases have also recognized that nervous, evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion.” Id. at 124.

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress but withdrew it because defendant lacked standing. The post-conviction court found that it would have denied the motion to suppress if it had not been withdrawn, and that supported the findings of the trial court so there was no IAC. Cluck v. State, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 557 (October 25, 2007).*

Plaintiff’s complaint fairly pled a Fourth Amendment violation without specifically pleading § 1983, and when the complaint was amended and pled § 1983, defendant attempted to remove the action to federal court. The removal was untimely. Howard v. City of Atlanta, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79283 (N.D. Ga. October 25, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.