NOTES ON USE
A. Ground Rules:
1. THIS WEBSITE IS NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR THE BOOK. It is: (a)
a daily summary of search and seizure cases and news, and (b)
an aid to owners of the book to supplement it. See ¶s 5-6
of the disclaimer in part B at the end of this page. [I get feedback
from those how tell me that some users of this website find that
"has too much information" and "is unusable."
These users do not know what this website is for, they never paid
attention to the first sentence above when it was on the home
page, and they cannot be helped if they think this substitutes
for the book.] Let's be realistic here: I get royalties from the
book and supplement, and I am not about to compromise Lexis' ability
to sell them which hurts both of us.
2. Acronyms: These should be obvious to those involved in the
criminal justice system:
BOLO = be on the look out
CI = confidential informant
DL = driver's license
GFE = good faith exception
IAC = ineffective assistance of counsel
LEO = law enforcement officer (a police term, not a lawyer term)
MSJ = motion for summary judgment
PC = probable cause
PO = probation or parole officer
QI = qualified immunity
REP = reasonable expectation of privacy
RS = reasonable suspicion
SI = search incident
SJ = summary judgment
SW = search warrant
UA = urinalysis
* = a case unlikely to make it to the supplement because it involves
a basic RS or PC finding or is factbound or redundant.
2. A footnote ending in ".1" or the like indicates new
text in the supplement. Not having the book and current supplement
will make one's research incomplete.
3. Timing of Postings:
a. Case citations come to me through a Lexis Eclipse® search
arriving around 5:30 a.m. Central Time. Postings to this website
are made usually, depending upon various factors in my real work
schedule and life, within three hours of receipt from Lexis. I
am a practicing criminal defense lawyer, and I cannot bring myself
to work on the web site on days I am in trial or having an appellate
argument first thing in the morning. I can tell from usage statistics
that the first peak in usage is around 9 a.m. Eastern Time, and
I try to meet that goal, but I cannot guarantee it.
b. Supreme Court cases are noted as soon as I find out about them
and I can get the syllabus either from the Court's website or
Lexis. If I am in court or on the road when that happens, that
posting will be late, but it will be up as soon as possible. I
have occasionally beat the news services in posting cases because
I was looking for a case and quickly found it posted, but I also
find out about most from list servs and news reports. If, however,
I am in trial, I can't be posting immediately. (The day the Supreme
Court called in 1995 to say I won Wilson v. Arkansas I was in
trial until 6 p.m. that evening.) This website did not exist back
then, but that is an example.
c. Every once in a while, a case either slips through the Eclipse
search, I must have overlooked it, or it becomes published after
it was passed over because I believed it was unpublished or it
slipped through the Eclipse net. In those cases, the case is noted
as soon as it is found. Some courts have cases in the hands of
Lexis overnight, but some take months. I see a pattern developing,
but I'm not yet revealing what the states are. You can see some
at change of the new year. Sometimes states take several months
to get their cases to Lexis.
d. Updated citations are posted as long as new citation comes
out while the case is still on the home page. Periodically, time
permitting, all citations are run through Lexis Shepards®
to insure completeness.
4. Unreported cases: Unreported cases do not get posted because
they usually lack authority in their local jurisdiction. I simply
do not have the time to read unreported cases, too. I already
average 8 hours a week on this website, and nonpublished cases
just aren't relevant 99.5% of the time. Once in a while, a court
buries a good case in unpublished, and I find out about it and
use it. Some states don't publish, but everything is potential
authority. Ohio, for example.
5. The author is a practicing criminal defense lawyer whose expertise
in search and seizure cases is available for retained consultation
and representation. The author does, however, provide free limited
consultation for criminal defense lawyers who are members of NACDL.
If you think I am too expensive, you should consider hiring my
associate, Patrick J. Benca. Within five years of passing the
bar, he won nearly 25 search and seizure appeals, one of which
became an ALR Annotation.
B. Disclaimer and Other Legalese:
1. LexisNexis® has no connection to this web site.
2. The use of this website does not constitute the rendering of
legal advice by the author to the reader.
3. Without access to the printed book and its current paper supplement,
parts of this electronic supplement may appear to or be misleading.
Therefore, readers run the risk of taking something out of context.
4. Every effort is made to update this web site daily before 9
a.m. Eastern and to periodically Shepardize® the citations.
As stated above in A.3.a., I have a day job and answerable to
courts, clients, and other obligations. And, I try to have a life.
All of this sometimes limits this website to being updated late
in the day or only every other day. It happens. I can tell by
usage statistics that visits really start after 9 a.m. Eastern,
so that is my goal.
C. Copyright Notices
1. Readers are free to cut and paste the content of this website
for e-mails or CLE papers as long as they note the source of the
material as this website, www.fourthamendment.com and Search and
Seizure (3d ed. 2000). As stated below, no copyright is claimed
by me in material that I quote, so that source must be noted.
2. Quotations from articles and cases are intended to be covered
by the fair use doctrine of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §
107. There is no intent to infringe. Besides, I don't have the
space, and I want readers to go to the original for the full text.
A good lawyer always checks the source (at least they used to).
3. © 2003-05 by John Wesley Hall, Jr. No copyright claimed
by the author in quotes from other sources.
|
Back to blog
©
2003-08
Online since Feb. 24, 2003
To search Search and Seizure on Lexis.com $
Contact / About
www.johnwesleyhall.com
www.LawofCriminalDefense.com
Latest Slip Opinions:
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Appellate Courts
First Circuit
Second Circuit
Third Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit
Sixth Circuit
Seventh Circuit
Eighth Circuit
Ninth Circuit
Tenth Circuit
Eleventh Circuit
D.C. Circuit
Military Courts
State Appellate Courts
LexisONE
free caselaw
Findlaw Free Opinions
Most recent SCOTUS cases:
2007-08 Term:
Virginia v. Moore (06-1082)
Arizona v. Gant (07-542)
Herring v. United States (07-513)
Pearson v. Callahan (07-751)
2006-07 Term:
Brendlin
v. California, 127 S. Ct. 2400, 168 L. Ed. 2d 132 (June 18, 2007)
Los
Angeles County v. Rettele, 127 S. Ct. 1989, 167 L. Ed. 2d 974 (May 21, 2007)
Scott
v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 1769, 167 L. Ed. 2d 686 (April 30, 2007) (video)
Wallace
v. Kato, 127 S. Ct. 1091, 166 L. Ed. 2d 973 (February 21, 2007)
2005-06 Term:
Samson
v. California, 126 S.Ct. 2193, 165 L. Ed. 2d 250 (June 19,
2006)
Hudson
v. Michigan, 126 S.Ct. 2159, 165 L. Ed. 2d 56 (June 15,
2006)
Brigham
City v. Stuart, 126 S.Ct. 1943, 164 L.Ed.2d 650 (May 22,
2006)
Georgia
v. Randolph, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (March 22,
2006)
Research Links:
Supreme Court:
Cert.
Grants
S. Ct.
Docket
Solicitor General's
site
Briefs
online (but no amicus briefs)
Curiae (Yale
Law)
Oyez
Project (NWU)
"On the Docket"–Medill
S.Ct.
Monitor: Law.com
S.Ct.
Com't'ry: Law.com
SCOTUSBlog
General:
LexisOne
Legal Website Directory
Google (never overlook)
Vivisimo
Crimelynx
(free legal research portal website)
Questia
online library $
Lexis.com
$
Lexis.com
(criminal law/ 4th Amd) $
Findlaw.com
Findlaw.com
(4th Amd)
Westlaw.com
$
F.R.Crim.P.
41
www.fd.org
DOJ
Computer Search Manual
USSS
computer search website
Talkleft
ACLU on privacy
Privacy
Foundation
Electronic Privacy
Information Center
Criminal
Appeal (post-conviction) (9th Cir.)
How
Appealing Blog
"Affidavits [for search warrants] are like sex. Even when they're bad, they're
good."
—John Wesley Hall, Jr., Ark. Democrat-Gazette, Aug. 26, 2001
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
—Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)
“A patriot must be ready to defend his country against his government.”
—Edward Abbey
“Experience should teach us to be most on guard to
protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born
to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded
rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men
of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
—United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438, 479 (1925) (Brandeis,
J., dissenting)
"Freedom is just another word for nothing
left to lose."
—Kris Kristopherson, "Me and Bobby McGee" (sung by Janis Joplin)
“Liberty—the freedom from unwarranted
intrusion by government—is as easily lost through insistent nibbles by
government officials who seek to do their jobs too well as by those whose purpose
it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark.”
—United States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989)
"You can't always get what you want /
But if you try sometimes / You just might find / You get what you need."
—Mick Jagger & Kieth Richards
"In Germany, they first came for the communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for
the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came
for me–and by that time there was nobody left to speak up."
—Martin Niemöller (1945) [he served seven years in a concentration
camp]
“You know, most men would get discouraged by
now. Fortunately for you, I am not most men!”
—Pepé LePew
"There is never enough time, unless you are serving it."
—Malcolm Forbes
"The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers,
is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which
reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that
those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being
judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting
out crime."
—Johnson v. United States, 333 US 10, 13-14 (1948)
"The course of true law pertaining to searches and seizures, as enunciated
here, has not--to put it mildly--run smooth."
--Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 618 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). |