{"id":9797,"date":"2013-11-15T14:45:23","date_gmt":"2013-11-15T14:45:23","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-11-15T14:45:23","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=9797","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUSBlog: Argument recap: Court seems poised to limit Georgia v. Randolph to \u201cphysically present\u201d co-tenants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Rory Little, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2013\/11\/argument-recap-court-seems-poised-to-limit-georgia-v-randolph-to-physically-present-co-tenants\/\">Argument recap: Court seems poised to limit Georgia v. Randolph to \u201cphysically present\u201d co-tenants<\/a>, SCOTUSBlog:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When co-tenants jointly occupy a residence, the Court long ago held in Matlock (1974) that any one of the co-tenants can consent to a police search of the entire property.  But in Georgia v. Randolph in 2006, a five-to-three Court held that if two co-tenants are \u201cphysically present\u201d when the police ask for consent, and one expressly objects while the other consents, the police must honor the objection and not enter the residence absent some other exception to the normal warrant requirement.  Yesterday\u2019s argument in Fernandez v. California presented follow-up questions about how far Randolph goes, or possibly whether it should be overruled.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=9797\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9797\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}