Attempting to seize documents by an IRS summons is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. United States v. Sanders, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145711 (S.D. Ill. October 9, 2013).<\/p>\n
\u201cWe conclude that the intervening circumstances, including the traffic infraction, the discovery of Jackson as the driver whom the police had probable cause to arrest, and the position of Jackson’s pants, were sufficient to dissipate any taint caused by the illegal reliance on the GPS device.\u201d Jackson v. State<\/a>, 996 N.E.2d 378 (Ind. App. 2013).*<\/p>\n \u201cHere, Holbert acknowledges that officers had reasonable suspicion to initiate a Terry stop [for burglary] but contends that that suspicion did not justify placing him in handcuffs. … Holbert also asserts that the officers did not have proper justification to pat him down and that the officers could not have recognized the marijuana on his person through the plain feel doctrine. We cannot agree with any of these arguments.\u201d Holbert v. State<\/a>, 996 N.E.2d 396 (Ind. App. 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading