Intoxication alone doesn\u2019t make consent invalid. United States v. Smith, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144719 (D. Ariz. October 7, 2013).<\/p>\n
In a rare case, the court finds the officer not credible on the question of whether defendant committed a lane violation, and it finds the stop was without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Garcia, 976 F. Supp. 2d 856 (N.D. Tex. 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant validly knowingly and intelligently waived his search claim by pleading guilty. Condrey v. United States, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144688 (N.D. W.Va. July 12, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant had evidence against him suppressed in New York state court. He was later indicted in federal court for something else, and, even if defense counsel had successfully moved to suppress the search in federal court, defendant can\u2019t show that the outcome would be different, so he does not prevail. Garza v. United States, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144823 (S.D. Ala. June 10, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading