Defendant was brought in to talk about her husband\u2019s arrest for drug activity off-base. She was not the focus of the investigation. \u201cOne of the AFOSI agents took the smoke break with the appellant. He testified, \u2018I told her that it\u2019s just a consent to search her house; we weren’t looking at her we were looking at her husband, and she didn’t have to sign it.\u2019 He also told the appellant \u2018if she hadn’t done anything wrong that [sic] she had nothing to worry about.\u2019\u201d She consented, and it was valid. United States v. Olson, 2013 CCA LEXIS 822 (A.F. C.C.A. September 11, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Officers were inside by consent, and they were looking for somebody involved in a shooting. They told defendant to stand up and a gun was under where he was lying. That was in plain view. United States v. Antone-Herron, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142589 (N.D. Ala. September 20, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging GPS on his car where Jones was decided two years after his conviction. It would have been overruled at the time and affirmed on appeal, and the good faith exception would have applied. Hutcherson v. United States, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143249 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2013).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading