Defendant had no standing or reasonable expectation of privacy in a stolen vehicle he took in a car jacking, and that includes a bag he carried to the car before the chase. United States v. Goldstein, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189234 (D. Nev. October 26, 2012)*; United States v. Goldstein, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137568 (D. Nev. September 25, 2013).*<\/p>\n
The officer\u2019s statement in support of the search warrant was false but not intentionally so. Even without it, there was probable cause for the search warrant so no suppression. United States v. Jimenez, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136227 (D. Kan. September 24, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s vehicle had to be towed from the scene, and it was searched for inventory, validly finding a gun. United States v. Gibson, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136692 (S.D. Ohio September 24, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s only argument on the search was asking the court to review whether there was PC for the warrant under the four corners of the affidavit. There was. United States v. Petruk, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136622 (D. Minn. September 4, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s wife consented, and her revocation of consent came after firearms were found and seized, and revocation doesn\u2019t stop seizure of that which was found. United States v. Assante, 979 F. Supp. 2d 756 (W.D. Ky. 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading