Defendant consented to view a contact in her cell phone. She showed the phone and the officer never touched it. United States v. Wright-Darrisaw, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96421 (W.D. N.Y. May 2, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Even assuming defense counsel filed a motion to suppress and it was granted, there was a wealth of other information at trial that convicted the defendant, and there\u2019s no reasonable probability of a different outcome. United States v. Murphy, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97149 (M.D. Pa. July 11, 2013).*<\/p>\n
The officer here stopped defendant \u201clate at night\u201d on I-20 for a window tint violation, and could smell marijuana coming from the car after the stop. That led to defendant\u2019s arrest, and the vehicle would have to be towed, so there was an inventory that produced more drugs. The inventory was valid. Beville v. State<\/a>, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 583 (July 3, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading