Defendant failed to object at the time to the scope of the consent search of his car going under the hood. The general consent was enough to go under the hood. United States v. Fletcher, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76057 (D. Minn. May 29, 2013),* R&R 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76178 (D. Minn. May 3, 2013).*<\/p>\n
COA on a 2255 IAC claim from a failed suppression hearing is denied. The defendant didn\u2019t show anything that added up to IAC: defendant was validly stopped and previously conceded it, the radio log wouldn\u2019t show no consent, and failure to call alleged witnesses to the traffic stop wouldn\u2019t prove anything from a failure of an offer of proof. United States v. Polly<\/a>, 525 Fed. Appx. 862 (10th Cir. 2013).*<\/p>\n Based on the undisputed testimony of the lone police witness at the suppression hearing, the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress defendant\u2019s stop for DUI. State v. Wagster<\/a>, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 441 (April 30, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading