{"id":8539,"date":"2013-08-22T07:07:56","date_gmt":"2013-03-27T11:07:53","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-03-27T11:07:53","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=8539","title":{"rendered":"CA10: Jury verdict for unreasonable force and handcuffing without objective justification is upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jury verdict for unreasonable force and handcuffing without objective justification is upheld. Also, there were disputed facts for trial. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/11\/11-4197.pdf\">Plascencia v. Taylor<\/a>, 514 Fed. Appx. 711 (10th Cir. 2013):<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Use of forceful measures does not automatically convert an investigative detention into an arrest. See United States v. Shareef, 100 F.3d 1491, 1502 (10th Cir. 1996). However, the &#8220;use of firearms, handcuffs, and other forceful techniques generally exceed the scope of an investigative detention and enter the realm of an arrest.&#8221; Cortez, 478 F.3d at 1116. Our precedent is thus clear-contrary to Taylor&#8217;s argument-that the level of force employed by an officer is relevant to the inquiry of whether a seizure was a Terry stop or an arrest. See id. at 1130 (&#8220;[A]n unreasonable level of force transforms a Terry detention into an arrest requiring probable cause.&#8221; (quotation omitted)); see also Lundstrom v. Romero, 616 F.3d 1108, 1120 (10th Cir. 2010) (use of forceful techniques relevant to classification of detention); Manzanares, 575 F.3d at 1149 (&#8220;[B]ased both on the duration of the detention and the use of forceful measures, we hold that Manzanares was arrested &#8230;.&#8221;); Gallegos v. City of Colorado Springs, 114 F.3d 1024, 1030 (10th Cir. 1997) (examining &#8220;whether the Terry stop escalated into an arrest following the application of the arm bar maneuver,&#8221; a forceful technique).<\/p>\n<p>. . .<br \/>\nFinally, we agree with the district court that the evidence was sufficient to uphold the jury&#8217;s verdict as to unlawful seizure. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable  to Plascencia, the jury could have concluded that Taylor: (1) immediately handcuffed Plascencia without any objectively reasonable officer safety concern; (2) applied several forceful techniques by repeatedly lifting Plascenicia&#8217;s arms behind his back and repeatedly striking Plascencia&#8217;s legs, again without any objectively reasonable safety concerns; and (3) forcefully moved Plascencia from the restaurant to a different location without any reasonable basis for doing so. See Cortez, 478 F.3d at 1115-16 (&#8220;[U]se of firearms, handcuffs, and other forceful techniques generally exceed the scope of an investigative detention and enter the realm of an arrest.&#8221; (quotation and citation committed)); id. at 1130 (&#8220;[A]n unreasonable level of force transforms a Terry detention into an arrest requiring probable cause.&#8221; (quotation omitted)); see also Royer, 460 U.S. at 504 (law enforcement&#8217;s &#8220;moving a suspect from one location to another during an investigatory detention&#8221; may suggest an arrest absent safety and security concerns); United States v. White, 584 F.3d 935, 953 (10th Cir. 2009) (&#8220;[P]olice may move a suspect without exceeding the bounds of an investigative detention when it is a reasonable means of achieving the legitimate goals of the detention given the specific circumstances of the case.&#8221; (quotation omitted)).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fourthamendment.com\/blog\">Back to blog<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=8539\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}