Defendant was subjected to an \u201cincredibly brief\u201d Terry stop to determine if he was armed in a high crime area known for guns. At the time defendant was arrested, the gun was visible inside the car with the doors closed, which made it not subject to search incident. It was, however, subject to plain view. United States v. Brown, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167017 (W.D. Pa. November 26, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Police had a warrant to search a residence, and they didn\u2019t need a separate search warrant to search one room of it. Defense counsel thus can\u2019t be ineffective. Ables v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167211 (S.D. Ohio November 26, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Plaintiff\u2019s Bivens claim against FCI Fort Dix had to go through PLRA exhaustion, which is explained in detail. Brown v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167085 (D. N.J. November 15, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading