{"id":7973,"date":"2013-06-19T10:23:30","date_gmt":"2012-11-17T10:40:44","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-11-17T10:40:44","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7973","title":{"rendered":"MA: Nexus was shown for SW for house by defendant going to place of meet right from house"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nexus for a search warrant for defendant\u2019s house was shown by the fact she left her house to go the place for the meet for a prearranged drug deal minutes after the call from the buyer. In other deliveries, she went from the place of the delivery back home. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.wl?rs=MAOR1.0&amp;ss=CNT&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;method=TNC&amp;service=Search&amp;fn=_top&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA4865893591711&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;fmqv=c&amp;action=Search&amp;origin=Search&amp;vr=1.0&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT32922103591711&amp;query=TO(ALLSCT+ALLSCTRS+ALLSCTOJ)&amp;mt=Westlaw&amp;rlti=1&amp;n=2&amp;rp=%2fsearch%2fdefault.wl&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB659693591711&amp;eq=search&amp;sv=Split\">Commonwealth v. Tapia<\/a>, 463 Mass. 721, 978 N.E.2d 534 (2012).<\/p>\n<p>Once a drug dog alerted, the more intensive search of the car was valid. [Also, this case involved letting the officer testify that defendant\u2019s multiple cell phones, empty pill bottles, and car rental agreements were indicative of drug dealing.] <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/3\/2012\/2012-ohio-5235.pdf\">State v. Brooks<\/a>, 2012 Ohio 5235, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 4580 (3d Dist. November 13, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant conceded that he was speeding, and that justified his stop. The stop was not overlong and was continued on reasonable suspicion. \u201cWithin minutes of the initial traffic stop, Norton provided Agent Campbell with a travel itinerary that seemed improbable; shortly thereafter, Comegys provided a different improbable itinerary and appeared nervous while searching for the car rental agreement.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca3.uscourts.gov\/opinarch\/113630np.pdf\">United States v. Comegys<\/a>, 504 Fed. Appx. 137 (3d Cir. 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7973\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}