Defendant had no standing that the cash he turned over to court clerk for bail money wouldn\u2019t be examined by the authorities. United States v. Donald, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122537 (E.D. Ky. August 6, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress letters received by defendant\u2019s co-defendant in jail that were used to impeach the co-defendant. Robinson v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123901 (N.D. W.Va. July 10, 2012),*<\/p>\n
The warrant for defendant\u2019s place and smartphone was issued with probable cause, and the alleged reckless disregard defendant seized on wasn\u2019t. United States v. Kraeger, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122673 (M.D. Pa. August 29, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Nineteen month old information is not stale in a child pornography case. The court cites one case with three year old information. United States v. Vaskas, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122792 (E.D. Pa. August 29, 2012).*<\/p>\n
On the government\u2019s unrebuted evidence that defendant signed the consent form and appeared to understand it, the search was found to be by consent. United States v. Young, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122699 (E.D. Tenn. August 7, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading