{"id":7427,"date":"2012-07-15T17:17:11","date_gmt":"2012-07-14T10:11:17","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-07-14T10:11:17","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7427","title":{"rendered":"New law review article: &#8220;Making the Most of Jones v. United States in a Surveillance Society: A Statutory Implementation of Mosaic Theory&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New law review article: <a href=\"http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2098002\">Making the Most of Jones v. United States in a Surveillance Society: A Statutory Implementation of Mosaic Theory<\/a> by Christopher Slobogin, Vanderbilt Law School forthcoming in Duke Journal of Constitutional Law &amp; Public Policy. Abstract:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the Supreme Court\u2019s recent decision in Jones v. United States a majority of the justices appeared to recognize that under some circumstances aggregation of information about an individual through government surveillance can amount to a Fourth Amendment search. If adopted by the Court, this notion \u2014 sometimes called \u201cmosaic theory\u201d \u2014 could bring about a radical change to Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, not just in connection with surveillance of public movements \u2014 the issue raised in Jones \u2014 but also with respect to the government\u2019s increasingly pervasive record-mining efforts. One reason the Court might avoid the mosaic theory is the perceived difficulty of implementing it. This solicited article provides, in the guise of a model statute, a means of doing so. More specifically, this article explains how proportionality reasoning and political process theory can provide concrete guidance for the courts and police in connection with physical and data surveillance. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7427\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}