{"id":7263,"date":"2012-07-25T15:58:38","date_gmt":"2012-06-08T07:55:33","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-06-08T07:55:33","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7263","title":{"rendered":"Cal.1: Improperly seized evidence excluded in criminal case still admissible in probation revo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The search of defendant\u2019s purse violated the Fourth Amendment, and it was excluded in her criminal case, but that did not make it excludable in her probation revocation proceeding. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.ca.gov\/opinions\/documents\/A131741.PDF\">People v. Lazlo<\/a>, 206 Cal. App. 4th 1063, 206 Cal. App. 4th 1063 (1st Dist. 2012):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[T]he exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation hearings, unless the police conduct at issue shocks the conscience. (See, e.g., United States v. Vandemark (9th Cir. 1975) 522 F.2d 1019, 1020 [\u201c[t]his accords with the almost unanimous view that the exclusionary rule does not usually apply in probation revocation proceedings\u201d]; People v. Harrison (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 803, 811 [245 Cal. Rptr. 204] (Harrison) [\u201cfederal law does not require application of the exclusionary rule to probation revocation hearings\u201d]; People v. Nixon (1982) 131 Cal.App.3d 687, 691, 693\u2013694 [183 Cal. Rptr. 878].)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7263\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7263\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}