The product of the wiretap in this case gave probable cause to believe that defendant had drugs in his car when he showed up as predicted. United States v. Carey, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72846 (S.D. Cal. May 24, 2012).*<\/p>\n
A juvenile\u2019s school photo ID was used in a photo lineup. He claimed an expectation of privacy in it, and the trial court granted a motion to suppress. Remanded for a determination of how all this came about because it can\u2019t be determined whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy on this record. \u201cSuch evidence might also help resolve whether the student identification card and photograph form part of the confidential \u2018student record\u2019 under State and Federal education regulations; if they are part of the student record, that fact would also bear on whether the juvenile had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the photograph.\u201d Commonwealth v. Zachary Z., 462 Mass. 319, 968 N.E.2d 381 (2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading