{"id":6972,"date":"2012-06-10T19:33:43","date_gmt":"2012-04-12T11:01:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-04-12T11:01:00","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6972","title":{"rendered":"FL2: IAC 4th Amd. claim requires pleading that defendant would have gone to trial"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s post-conviction claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress was fatally defective for not alleging prejudice. Would she have gone to trial and not pled? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.2dca.org\/opinions\/Opinion_Pages\/Opinion_Page_2012\/April\/April%2011,%202012\/2D11-2853.pdf\">Zanchez v. State<\/a>, 84 So. 3d 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012):*<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But upon further examination of her motion, we note that Ms. Zanchez has failed to allege that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel&#8217;s errors, she would not have pleaded guilty but would have insisted on going to trial. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); Nelson, 996 So. 2d at 952. Thus Ms. Zanchez&#8217;s motion completely omits an allegation of prejudice flowing from her attorney&#8217;s alleged deficient performance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The juvenile was detained pending \u201cinvestigation\u201d for loitering, and there was no reasonable suspicion for a patdown. The officer &#8220;testified that she routinely searches suspects prior to placing them in her vehicle as a safety precaution.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.3dca.flcourts.org\/Opinions\/3D09-2558.pdf\">D.S. v. State<\/a>, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5461 (Fla. 3d DCA April 11, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>A gap in the record on whether the independent source doctrine would support the search in question required remand. The case arose from a grow operation that the police visited without warrants. Outbuildings were searched off the curtilage and in open fields, but the court can\u2019t decide the question. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca11.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/ops\/201012480.op2.pdf\">United States v. Noriega<\/a>, 676 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6972\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6972","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6972","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6972"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6972\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6972"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6972"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6972"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}