{"id":6720,"date":"2012-08-25T12:51:40","date_gmt":"2012-02-24T00:02:35","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-02-23T08:49:47","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6720","title":{"rendered":"MD: Failure to train on difference between <em>Payton<\/em> and <em>Steagald<\/em> was a jury question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Failure to train on the difference between a <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=14936388408511643149&amp;q=payton%2Bv.%2Bnew%2Byork&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">Payton<\/a> entry on an arrest warrant of the arrestee\u2019s home and a <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=17799359578516732373&amp;q=steagald&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">Steagald<\/a> entry with a search warrant in the premises of a third person was a jury question on this record.  \u201c[A] jury could infer from the testimony of Prince George&#8217;s County Sheriff&#8217;s Department&#8217;s deputies that the State trained law enforcement officers to execute arrest warrants in a manner inconsistent with the rules of <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=14936388408511643149&amp;q=payton%2Bv.%2Bnew%2Byork&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">Payton<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=17799359578516732373&amp;q=steagald&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">Steagald<\/a>. There was, therefore, sufficient evidence to allow the question of whether the State breached its duty to train officers in a manner consistent with Fourth Amendment principles to reach the jury.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/mdcourts.gov\/opinions\/coa\/2012\/37a11.pdf\">Jones v. State<\/a>, 425 Md. 1, 38 A.3d 333 (2012).*<\/p>\n<p>Officers were in a crack house responding to a wounded person call. Defendant was more concerned about an open drawer than the person wounded, and an officer went to look and found cocaine. The defendant consented to a search of the premises. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.wl?ss=CNT&amp;origin=Search&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA9387740227232&amp;query=TO(ALLAPP+ALLAPPRS)&amp;method=TNC&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT556441227232&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB9287740227232&amp;fmqv=c&amp;eq=search&amp;rp=%2fsearch%2fdefault.wl&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;n=3&amp;vr=1.0&amp;action=Search&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;rlti=1&amp;service=Search&amp;fn=_top&amp;rs=MAOR1.0\">Commonwealth v. Carlton<\/a>, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 294 (February 16, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDoes a lawful stop of a motor vehicle for moving violations, the observation of a noticeable odor of freshly-burnt marijuana in the passenger compartment, and the recovery of two packages of marijuana from the driver authorize a police officer to do more than was permitted in Commonwealth v. Cruz, 459 Mass. 459, 945 N.E.2d 899 (2011)? We believe so.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.wl?ss=CNT&amp;origin=Search&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA9387740227232&amp;query=TO(ALLAPP+ALLAPPRS)&amp;method=TNC&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT556441227232&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB9287740227232&amp;fmqv=c&amp;eq=search&amp;rp=%2fsearch%2fdefault.wl&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;n=4&amp;vr=1.0&amp;action=Search&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;rlti=1&amp;service=Search&amp;fn=_top&amp;rs=MAOR1.0\">Commonwealth v. Daniel<\/a>, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 306, 962 N.E.2d 213 (2012),* Review granted by Commonwealth v. Daniel, 462 Mass. 1101, 967 N.E.2d 634, 2012 Mass. LEXIS 373 (Mass., May 3, 2012).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6720\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}