Israel officials captured Palestinian cell phone traffic that partly resulted in this indictment. That was sufficiently a foreign search. United States v. Al-Muhtadi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258887 (W.D. La. Nov. 10, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The complained of omissions from the affidavit for search warrant weren\u2019t material to the probable cause finding. If the information had been included, the warrant still wouldn\u2019t have been overbroad. United States v. Subil, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258589 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Probable cause was shown on the totality of information in the affidavit for warrant despite defendant\u2019s claim some allegations were too general or had possible innocent explanations. United States v. McGauley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258291 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 30, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256740 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 9, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Israel officials captured Palestinian cell phone traffic that partly resulted in this indictment. That was sufficiently a foreign search. United States v. Al-Muhtadi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258887 (W.D. La. Nov. 10, 2026). The complained of omissions from the affidavit … Continue reading