Officers came to defendant\u2019s house with an arrest warrant. When he entered they asked him about any weapons in the house before a protective sweep. He directed them to a gun in the bedroom. That was all reasonable and inevitable discovery applies. State v. Linley, 2026 Mo. App. LEXIS 450 (June 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There must be standing to challenge a takings claim, and it\u2019s like Fourth Amendment standing. Poppleton v. La Cite Dev., LLC, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12843 (4th Cir. May 4, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The CI\u2019s information was reasonable suspicion for this stop. United States v. Morgan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123860 (S.D. W.Va. June 4, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Police did a protective sweep of defendant\u2019s motel room finding shards of meth, but they remained there for six minutes per the body cam. That did not make the sweep unreasonable. United States v. Matarese, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122788 (M.D. Pa. June 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Officers came to defendant\u2019s house with an arrest warrant. When he entered they asked him about any weapons in the house before a protective sweep. He directed them to a gun in the bedroom. That was all reasonable and inevitable … Continue reading