Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant\u2019s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124571 (D. Minn. June 5, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The government had exigent circumstances to seize defendant\u2019s hard drive without a warrant because he repeatedly went into the room to get it and didn\u2019t produce it. The government was legitimately concerned that digital evidence could be deleted. Martin v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 270 (June 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant disclaimed any interest in two safes found in the vehicle he was driving claiming they belonged to his mother. This was abandonment. United States v. Burse, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122455 (S.D. Miss. June 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff sues pro se for herself as plaintiff alleging unreasonable seizure of her children. Not in this circuit. Fisk v. Okla. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124877 (E.D. Okla. May 4, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant\u2019s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading