EMS responded to an overdose call, and they reported what they saw inside which led to police getting a search warrant. Leon v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 171 (May 20, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cMissouri courts have indicated that the question of whether an arresting officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person was driving a motor vehicle in an intoxicated condition \u2014 like the question of whether probable cause existed for an arrest \u2014 presents what is essentially a mixed question of law and fact. \u2026 Thus, appellate courts defer to the trial court’s role as trier of fact in resolving factual issues regarding the circumstances that led to the arrest; however, the ultimate question of whether an arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was driving a motor vehicle in an intoxicated condition based on a particular set of facts (as found by the trial court) presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo.\u201d Olson v. Dir. of Revenue, 2026 Mo. App. LEXIS 389 n.4 (May 19, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Simmons rule of foregoing one constitutional right for another, there a Fourth and Fifth Amendment claim, doesn\u2019t fit with a Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim. Wilcox v. State, 2026 Fla. LEXIS 810 (May 21, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
EMS responded to an overdose call, and they reported what they saw inside which led to police getting a search warrant. Leon v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 171 (May 20, 2026). \u201cMissouri courts have indicated that the question of … Continue reading