\u201c\u2018[C]onsistent with the Fourth Amendment, immigration authorities may arrest individuals for civil immigration removal purposes pursuant to an administrative arrest warrant issued by an executive official, rather than by a judge.\u2019 Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 825 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 230-34, 80 S. Ct. 683, 4 L. Ed. 2d 668 (1960)).\u201d Smith v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105969 (W.D. Wash. May 13, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. He would lose on the merits anyway because the basis of knowledge of the CI was shown. People v. Delrio, 2026 NY Slip Op 02937, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3111 (1st Dept. May 12, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A check was found during a probation search, and it is not suppressed. The fact \u201cpapers\u201d are mentioned in the Fourth Amendment doesn\u2019t give them any special meaning in this context. United States v. Luc, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104901 (E.D.N.Y. May 12, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201c\u2018[C]onsistent with the Fourth Amendment, immigration authorities may arrest individuals for civil immigration removal purposes pursuant to an administrative arrest warrant issued by an executive official, rather than by a judge.\u2019 Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d … Continue reading