Defendant\u2019s alleged excessive nervousness wasn\u2019t visible on the video. And, even if he was, that\u2019s a reasonable response to multiple police cars showing up for a routine traffic stop. No reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. People v. Thomas, 2026 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3967 (Columbia Co. Apr. 27, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The government [pretty obviously] showed probable cause for prospective cell phone location information of a California to New York drug conspiracy. United States v. Guadarrama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93491 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant in his rented truck violated two traffic laws. While the officer was following he check the license plate reader information that showed the truck had made a quick round trip from Colorado to California. It turned out his girlfriend had rented the truck, but nothing on the rental agreement made him an authorized driver. A drug dog was run around the truck after calling in the information he had and before issuing any citations. The dog alerted, and the use of the ALPR didn\u2019t cause the stop. United States v. Salcido-Gonzalez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12341 (10th Cir. Apr. 29, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s alleged excessive nervousness wasn\u2019t visible on the video. And, even if he was, that\u2019s a reasonable response to multiple police cars showing up for a routine traffic stop. No reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. People v. Thomas, 2026 … Continue reading