Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand the phone over to police to conduct a warrantless Cellebrite extraction of the phone. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82689 (D. Idaho Apr. 13, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s 5\u00bd year old conviction is affirmed. The citizen informant was believable. People v. Flores, 2026 NY Slip Op 02215 (1st Dept. Apr. 14, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The community caretaking function supported entering defendant\u2019s car. He was slumped over his steering wheel in the parking lot of a closed convenience store that police were called about. Morrow v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 3461 (Tex. App. \u2013 San Antonio Apr. 15, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Body cavity searches in prison violate no Fourth Amendment rights unless they are punitive or excessive. Walker v. Arnold, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10701 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand … Continue reading