Passwords near a computer seen in a probation search around defendant\u2019s domestic partner\u2019s computer was reasonable suspicion defendant could have too. United States v. Berry, 24-2337 (8th Cir. April 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mandamus doesn\u2019t lie to remedy petitioner\u2019s constitutional claims. He has motions to suppress filed and handled, and he can appeal them. State ex rel. Alridge v. Sandusky Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 1214 (6th Dist. Mar. 31, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A prosecutor\u2019s office can order a vehicle held onto as criminal evidence until they\u2019re done with it without violating clearly established law. Rose v. Sapienza, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71775 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Email in search warrant returns are admissible as statements of a party opponent via Fed. R. Evid. 802(d)(2)(D). United States v. Guanghua, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71871 (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Passwords near a computer seen in a probation search around defendant\u2019s domestic partner\u2019s computer was reasonable suspicion defendant could have too. United States v. Berry, 24-2337 (8th Cir. April 3, 2026).* Mandamus doesn\u2019t lie to remedy petitioner\u2019s constitutional claims. He … Continue reading