{"id":6347,"date":"2011-12-22T07:55:49","date_gmt":"2011-12-03T06:48:10","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-12-03T06:48:10","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6347","title":{"rendered":"D.Minn.: TSA&#8217;s finding cash was reasonable as administrative search,  \u201c[a]lthough it is a close question\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Search of envelope finding cash by TSA, \u201c[a]lthough it is a close question,\u201d is lawful because TSA was looking for potential for \u201csheet explosives,\u201d and there was no sign this was an investigatory search, distinguishing other cases. United States v. Rosales, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137405 (D. Minn. November 30, 2011):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Although it is a close question \u2014 particularly given the lack of detail about the discovery of the envelope and why the TSA agent looked inside of it \u2014 the Court concludes that the search of the envelope was lawful. \u201c[T]he ultimate touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is \u2018reasonableness\u2019 &#8230;.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=6234529070422029398&amp;q=126+S.+Ct.+1943&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,10\">Brigham City v. Stuart<\/a>, 547 U.S. 398, 403, 126 S. Ct. 1943, 164 L. Ed. 2d 650 (2006). The government did not offer direct evidence of the condition of the envelope, but it is reasonable to infer that a standard, business-size envelope containing thousands of dollars of cash \u2014 as well as vehicle titles and photographs \u2014 would be quite bulky. It was thus reasonable for the TSA to take at least a cursory look in the envelope to confirm that it did not contain sheet explosives. In addition, unlike several recent cases in which courts have held that a TSA agent\u2019s search went beyond the permissible scope of an airport-screening search, see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2011\/08\/03\/09-10504.pdf\">McCarty<\/a>, 648 F.3d at 836; <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=4410788226515973850&amp;q=United+States+v.+Fofana&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,10\">United States v. Fofana<\/a>, 620 F. Supp. 2d 857, 863-65 (S.D. Ohio 2009), here there is absolutely no evidence that the TSA agent\u2019s search was motivated by anything other than legitimate security concerns. The agent did not know that Rosales was under surveillance or even that Rosales was suspected of criminal activity; in fact, the agent permitted Rosales to leave with his cash after the screening procedure was complete. The Court therefore finds that, in light of changes in technology since <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=15751490353808631070&amp;q=481+F.2d+884&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,10\">Kroll<\/a> [481 F.2d 884 (8th Cir. 1973)] was decided in 1973, the search of the envelope was within the proper scope of an airport-screening search.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6347\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}