The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. Colo. Jan. 16, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A 141-day delay in getting a federal search warrant for defendant\u2019s cell phone was not unreasonable, all things considered. United States v. Thibou, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299 (6th Cir. Jan. 16, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The record is incomplete on whether defendant consented. Any ruling would be based on a hypothetical. State v. Anderson, 2026 Kan. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 16, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ICE protestors have standing to assert Fourth Amendment claims against unlawful uses of force against them because they will continue. The possibility of a recurrence is more than speculative. Arrests of peaceful protestors is enjoined. High likelihood of success on the merits. Tincher v. Noem, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9436 (D. Minn. Jan. 16, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. … Continue reading