Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant, so CoA denied. Neeley v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29144 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The motion to suppress for lack of jurisdiction to serve warrants is denied. It\u2019s statewide. State v. Pratt, 2025 Del. Super. LEXIS 545 (Nov. 4, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion for defendant\u2019s frisk for having a gun, which was found, and search was inevitable because there were warrants for his arrest. United States v. Harris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219311 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhen reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress regarding a search warrant, our court first decides whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies; if it does, denial of the motion is appropriate without further inquiry.\u201d United States v. Washington, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29218 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant, so CoA denied. Neeley v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29144 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025). The motion to suppress for lack of jurisdiction to serve warrants is denied. It\u2019s … Continue reading