\u201cApplying this deference here, we conclude that the state judge properly found probable cause based on the informant’s claims that Howard stored illegal drugs at his apartment. The officer’s affidavit adequately established the informant’s reliability and basis of knowledge. First, the affidavit showed the informant’s reliability in two ways. It described the informant’s \u2018past performance\u2019 by explaining that the informant had \u2018always\u2019 given reliable information and had completed \u2018umerous\u2019 controlled buys. \u2026 It then discussed the \u2018independent investigative work\u2019 that corroborated the informant’s statements.\u201d United States v. Howard, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 28388 (6th Cir. Oct. 28, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s challenge to his parole arrest and search is barred by Heck. Jones v. Toth, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213537 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit showed a substantial basis for probable cause for defendant\u2019s CSLI to connect him to a robbery. Frazier v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 8552 (Tex. App. \u2013 Houston (1st Dist.) Nov. 6, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cApplying this deference here, we conclude that the state judge properly found probable cause based on the informant’s claims that Howard stored illegal drugs at his apartment. The officer’s affidavit adequately established the informant’s reliability and basis of knowledge. First, … Continue reading