{"id":62063,"date":"2025-10-04T17:07:39","date_gmt":"2025-10-04T22:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62063"},"modified":"2025-10-04T17:07:46","modified_gmt":"2025-10-04T22:07:46","slug":"ca2-warrantless-search-of-ptfs-uber-app-history-was-a-4a-violation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62063","title":{"rendered":"CA2: Warrantless search of ptf&#8217;s Uber app history was a 4A violation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Warrantless search of a cell phone to access plaintiff\u2019s Uber history stated a Fourth Amendment claim. <a href=\"http:\/\/httpshalite.ca2.uscourts.gov\/decisions\/isysquery\/4d1b48b4-9566-42be-aff1-2c39aa89d432\/1\/doc\/24-1755_so.pdf#xml=https:\/\/ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov\/decisions\/isysquery\/4d1b48b4-9566-42be-aff1-2c39aa89d432\/1\/hilite\/\">Etere v. Nassau Cty.<\/a>, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25753 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even if defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search warrant for a lack of particularity, there\u2019s no prejudice here based on all the evidence the state had that defendant was involved in the homicide. Evans v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 219 (Sep. 30, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The passenger in this vehicle doesn\u2019t have standing, and the evidence was in plain view. United States v. Nunez-Santana, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196260 (D.P.R. Oct. 1, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Nest camera video obtained from Google by warrant was properly authenticated. Campbell v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 839 (Oct. 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Warrantless search of a cell phone to access plaintiff\u2019s Uber history stated a Fourth Amendment claim. Etere v. Nassau Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25753 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025). Even if defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62063\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[124,5,12,23,51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-admissibility-of-evidence","category-cell-phones","category-computer-searches","category-ineffective-assistance","category-plain-view"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62063"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62063\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62064,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62063\/revisions\/62064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}