Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of others that affected him, a theory rejected in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-172 (1969). United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190766 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 26, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officers had arguable probable cause for plaintiff\u2019s arrest. \u201cAlthough Vasquez’s description did not completely line up with Archangel’s height and age, Vinogradov and Crowder were able to view the perpetrators and judge their ages on surveillance footage from the second Subway robbery. \u2026 The detectives also saw a composite sketch prepared by a sketch artist. Archangel’s co-defendant, Welch, implicated Archangel and stated that Archangel looked like the person in the composite sketch. \u2026 The Mazda Prot\u00e9g\u00e9 used at the scene of the crimes was located at the apartment complex where Archangel resided. \u2026 The detectives found the murder weapon and Archangel’s identification card inside the apartment in which Archangel resided. \u2026 As shown in the booking photographs taken in 2017, Archangel also had a scar under his eye similar to the one Dent described on the shooter. \u2026\u201d Archangel v. City of Houston, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190656 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of others that affected him, a theory rejected in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-172 (1969). United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190766 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 26, 2025). … Continue reading