D.C. Code provision on rental unit inspections requires an administrative warrant if the owner refuses inspection, so it\u2019s not facially unconstitutional. Lyle v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18954 (D.C. Cir. July 29, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Two BAC results here: The first was challenged because the notice of consent was allegedly defective and the trial court suppressed. The second was by search warrant that wasn\u2019t challenged. The first is immaterial. Reversed. State v. Coggins, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5479 (Tex. App. \u2013 Houston (1st Dist.) July 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner seeks a 2241 habeas as an alternative to a successor 2255 re-raising this Fourth Amendment claim, but it doesn\u2019t fit. Crawford v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144139 (D. Mont. July 28, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This immigration arrest was with probable cause. United States v. Guzman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143963 (E.D.N.Y. July 28, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
D.C. Code provision on rental unit inspections requires an administrative warrant if the owner refuses inspection, so it\u2019s not facially unconstitutional. Lyle v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18954 (D.C. Cir. July 29, 2025). Two BAC results here: … Continue reading