{"id":61518,"date":"2025-07-22T14:20:15","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T19:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61518"},"modified":"2025-07-22T14:20:15","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T19:20:15","slug":"d-c-cir-officer-saying-he-had-warrants-required-remand-for-whether-consent-was-mere-acquiescence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61518","title":{"rendered":"D.C.Cir.: Officer saying he had &#8220;warrants&#8221; required remand for whether consent was mere acquiescence"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The district court erred in not considering whether defendant acquiesced in consenting to a search. The officer said he had \u201cwarrants,\u201d but there was no clarification whether it was an arrest warrant or search warrant. Reversed. <a href=\"https:\/\/media.cadc.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/docs\/2025\/07\/23-3226-2126623.pdf\">United States v. Glover<\/a>, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18091 (D.C. Cir. July 22, 2025):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>The district court found that when Officer Creamer stated he had &#8220;warrants,&#8221; he &#8220;was telling Brewer that there were outstanding arrest warrants for the brothers and that he was not asking to search the apartment.&#8221; J.A. 175. Critically, however, the district court did not determine whether Officer Creamer&#8217;s references to a warrant-even if understood to be for an arrest and not a search warrant-rendered Brewer&#8217;s assent to a search mere acquiescence. In other words, the district court did not consider whether Officer Creamer&#8217;s &#8220;invocation of a warrant was tantamount to a pronouncement that [Brewer] had no right to resist the search.&#8221; United States v. Griffith, 867 F.3d 1265, 1280 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quotations and citation omitted).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nor did the district court consider whether Officer Creamer&#8217;s statement that he &#8220;need[ed]&#8221; to search the apartment for Brewer&#8217;s brothers in conjunction with his reference to warrants rendered Brewer&#8217;s assent to the search mere acquiescence. J.A. 174. The district court observed that Officer Creamer&#8217;s statement that he &#8220;need[ed]&#8221; to search for Brewer&#8217;s brothers, &#8220;did not appear in context to be an assertion of authority he lacked, but rather a plea.&#8221; J.A. 174-75. But it did not consider the compounded effect of Officer Creamer&#8217;s statements that he had warrants and that he needed to search the apartment for Brewer&#8217;s brothers on Brewer&#8217;s ability to voluntarily consent to the search.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The district court erred in not considering whether defendant acquiesced in consenting to a search. The officer said he had \u201cwarrants,\u201d but there was no clarification whether it was an arrest warrant or search warrant. Reversed. United States v. Glover, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61518\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-voluntariness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61518"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61519,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61518\/revisions\/61519"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}