Fleeing an arrest under what is now alleged to be an invalid warrant and abandoning property is still abandonment. United States v. Pool, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138465 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for plaintiff\u2019s arrest despite the fact the state dismissed the case. A Tenth Circuit case that the police should have viewed a video before the arrest is only dictum. Also, \u201cAlberty’s brief gives no more than perfunctory treatment to a claim of unreasonable search and seizure. Issues not sufficiently argued in briefs are considered abandoned.\u201d In re Trip, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18009 (2d Cir. July 21, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was cause for defendant\u2019s stop but it was extended without reasonable suspicion. Motion to suppress granted. People v. Mendiola, 2025 Guam Trial Order LEXIS 140 (Super. Ct. July 7, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Fleeing an arrest under what is now alleged to be an invalid warrant and abandoning property is still abandonment. United States v. Pool, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138465 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 2025). There was probable cause for plaintiff\u2019s arrest … Continue reading