\u201cGiven the length of Estrada’s membership in the two groups, the volume of files depicting child pornography shared during Estrada’s membership, and the detailed description of a file shared while Estrada was a participant in one of the groups, the magistrate judge had a substantial basis to find probable cause.\u201d United States v. Ramirez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135907 (D. Mass. July 16, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the body camera video and the papers in the motion for summary judgment, the officers had reasonable suspicion for detaining plaintiff. Burlow v. City of Detroit, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134529 (E.D. Mich. July 15, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Aside from the fact defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived all his pretrial motions, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress that couldn\u2019t prevail. United States v. Valentino, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136196 (D. Minn. July 17, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cGiven the length of Estrada’s membership in the two groups, the volume of files depicting child pornography shared during Estrada’s membership, and the detailed description of a file shared while Estrada was a participant in one of the groups, the … Continue reading